I can't even begin to list the number of articles, videos and Facebook and Twitter entries from the day our country remembered the deaths of 20 first graders. It is almost overwhelming. But let me start with the article from the vigil held in my town. What I love about this article is the emphasis on the children and school safety. The event was very moving and one of the few, if not the only, held in an elementary school. We sat amongst the children's books and some art projects to honor those 26 who died last year. Speakers spoke about the horror of school shootings and the measures schools have taken to keep kids safe knowing that school shootings could happen anywhere. From the article:
Some of the people at the vigil were members of my church which has always been out in front with support for common sense gun measures. People were talking about the above article in church yesterday before the children's Christmas program began. I asked for prayers for the families of Newtown and for families all over America and now, for the families of those affected by our latest school shooting in Colorado. Yet another angry teen-ager used a gun to exact some sort of revenge or get even with innocent people. A young girl is now fighting for her life as a result and the shooter is dead by his own bullet.The half-hour event concluded with community members taking turns reading the first name of each of the Sandy Hook victims and ringing a bell.It was one of numerous memorial events across the country, many of which were sponsored by groups advocating stricter gun-control laws. That was true for the Myers-Wilkins event, where one of the sponsors was the Northland chapter of the Brady Campaign/Protect Minnesota.Joan Peterson, one of the group’s leaders, said the issue was brought home again on Friday when a teenager opened fire at Arapahoe High School in Colorado, wounding two students before killing himself.“It’s an all-too-familiar scene,” Peterson told the group. “To think we shouldn’t do something about this is ridiculous.” (...)But like the parents of Sandy Hook before last Dec. 14, Myers-Wilkins parents have the expectation that their children are safe at school, Duluth Mayor Don Ness said.“I have two children who go to Myers-Wilkins, and we know it is a safe school,” Ness told the group. “The reality is, however, that in each of these tragic shootings at schools, parents also believed that in sending their kids to school that morning they would be safe.”Kathy Bogen, executive director of the Myers-Wilkins Community School Collaborative, noted that it, like Duluth’s other newly built or renovated schools, was designed with safety in mind. Visitors can enter in only one place, and entry is only allowed “for people who we know are part of our school community.”The entire school practices lockdown drills, she added.But there’s more to the school’s approach than structural changes and drills, Bogen said. The staff strives to make children feel part of the community. Each day opens with pupils in a circle, reciting an anti-bullying pledge.“So school becomes more than teaching lessons about reading, writing, mathematics,” she said. “It’s how to live in community with each other, how to support one another, how to understand one another.”
Back to the church Christmas program- The families of the 20 children who were massacred at the Sandy Hook elementary school won't be going to holiday programs for their murdered children or celebrating whatever religious traditions they celebrate. That's the thing. Real people are affected by gun violence. It could happen anywhere any time and it does, actually. On purpose, we read only the first names of the Sandy Hook victims because Ben could be any Ben. Ana could be any Ana, Dylan could be any Dylan. One woman who rang the bell Saturday at our vigil got the name of Lauren, one of the slain teachers. This woman's daughter's name is Lauren. One man named Don read the name of Dawn- the principal of the Sandy Hook elementary school. It could have been any Dawn or any Don.
So why do the shootings continue? Why do we let them continue? What would our founding fathers have thought about the shooting at Sandy Hook elementary school? From the linked article from The Daily Beast:
Was this what they had in mind when they formed the wording for the second amendment? I don't think so.The Sandy Hook Elementary School has been torn down, but the yellow house still stands with its plaque attesting to having been built before the founding fathers even promulgated the Second Amendment. That they drafted it as they did seems to me proof they did not imagine anything like the Sandy Hook Massacre could occur. They surely would have been much more precise in their language about the importance of a militia if they had known that as it was written the amendment would help to put guns in the hands of killers at Columbine and Virginia Tech and so many other places.Such a massacre could not have happened back then, and not just because Sandy Hook had only a one-room schoolhouse. The arms that the founding fathers said we had a right to bear were single shot muskets. Everybody save for perhaps one unlucky soul would have had a chance to escape while the would-be mass murderer was forced to reload.What seems certain as you now stand by that yellow house built in the time of the founding fathers is that they would be horrified to know that something they drafted in the name of freedom had contributed to 20 school children being murdered along with six adults.
The reason our country can't make meaningful change to gun laws that would actually prevent some of our shootings is because of the corporate gun lobby, plain and simply. I ran across this article, just one of many written on the subject of the gun lobby. From the article:
Disturbing but too true. I think it's becoming more evident to most people in the country who are way ahead of their elected leaders. But never mind. Common sense is in short supply in the U.S. Congress. Yesterday Nicholas Kristof wrote an article for the New York Times titled: The Killer Who Supports Gun Control. Kristof wrote about interviewing a man (oddly) named John Lennon who is serving time in the Attica State Prison for murdering someone with an assault rifle. Lennon wrote this amazing article about we need to do something about gun laws to make us safer. Please read this if you read nothing else today. If we can't take a lesson from this man, who will we listen to? From his article:There is little hope for any gun control legislation in 2014 because as midterm elections loom large, the NRA and a new 501(c)(4) non-profit, National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), which touts itself as to the right of the NRA is poised to outspend even the powerful NRA. The group’s source of funding is secret (501 dark money) and its leadership has close ties to Ron and Rand Paul who led the filibuster effort in the Senate to defeat the Toomey-Manchin background check amendment.When Americans heed President Obama’s advice to remember the tragedy that occurred in Newtown Connecticut last year, they may grieve for the 20 children and six adults who were slaughtered like animals. However, the real tragedy is that the gun fanatics and lobbyists have the real power in America in the form of limitless dark money and report cards to keep track of which legislator followed the will of 90% of the population and who obeyed the gun fanatics of America; the NRA, Koch brothers, ALEC, and now NAGR. Sadly, those report cards will be no consolation for the next group of survivors grieving their sons, daughters, mothers, and fathers who will be victims of the what House Republicans will pretend to be looking at; the source of violence in our country, the proliferation of guns.
And then these important words from Lennon's piece:When I was 24 I killed an associate with an assault rifle. Between my father’s suicide with a gun, and committing murder with a gun, I’m part of America’s ugly phenomenon: Upwards of 20,000 people commit suicide with a gun and 11,000 are murdered with a gun annually — yet many dismiss guns as the problem. I do take responsibility for the murder; I’m sorry for taking his life, and all the life he could have had but without a gun I would not have killed… a bold claim that screams rationalization, I know. But God knows I believe this to be true.If I didn’t have that perfect killing machine I would have had to earn the kill — like a seasoned bow hunter I’d have to hit him just right leaving no room for error. Could I have stabbed him? Strangled him? Bludgeoned him? If I had done so and he hadn’t died, why would that have made me less culpable than I am now, a man who swiftly and cowardly shot another man to death? A killer nonetheless, I hash these things out, in my head, in my cell, in Attica serving 28 years to life. (...)The mantra “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” reverberates throughout our society. How about “people kill less people without guns?” It’s clear that the only reason I’m alive is because my assailant didn’t have his weapon of choice. Can you imagine if we had access to guns in prison?I may have succumbed to suicide if I had a gun in prison. Hanging myself seemed grim, it would entail suffocating which reminded me of bad dreams about drowning. To hang until death you have to be dead set on suicide. Where the pain of life shadows the pain you will experience strangling yourself to death. It’s chilling. (...)
Perhaps a gun doesn’t entice ones appetite for murder (it did mine though) or suicide. But it is the perfect tool to carry out the act when the thought arises. Many murders and suicides would be fleeting thoughts if guns weren’t so ubiquitous.As our country remains incredibly polarized by his debate, a Machiavellian gun sector sits off to the side enjoying record earnings. I’m all for the market system, but when the products are killing machines, why shouldn’t we tighten measures to keep guns out of the hands of people like me? I suggested a few simple laws that could affect criminal behavior, in my article at the Atlantic online. But Washington does nothing.
I'm blown away by Lennon's wise observations made from a prison cell. He is asking for change in America. He is asking for our Congress to act. He is asking for what the majority of Americans want but can't seem to get because of the total resistance of a minority of extremists and the gun industry. Who should influence public policy in America? The corporate gun lobby whose profits rely on selling the weapons that have the potential to kill another human being? Or the voices of families, of victims, of those affected by the violence, of the majority of even American gun owners and yes, even those who have perpetrated the violence?Truly I’m blown away. Is the status quo really okay? Until we relinquish our apathy I suppose we’ll keep pretending this is the greatest nation on earth as we parade through life to the relentless drumbeat of death.
Sometimes the voices of the majority do get heard, fortunately. On the same day as we held events in memory of the 26 who were murdered in Newtown, Connecticut last December 14th, the town of Exeter, Rhode Island had a special election to recall 4 Town Council members who had the nerve to want conceal carry permits to be issued by the state instead of the local town clerk. Most of the time, with the exception of the recent Colorado recalls, when voters are allowed to make their decision, they come down on the side of common sense. And that is what happened in this recall election yesterday. From the article:
I love this statement by one of the gun rights extremists( from the article):Exeter residents came out in force Saturday to soundly defeat an attempt by gun-rights advocates and others to unseat four Town Council members who had asked that the state take over issuing local permits to carry concealed weapons.About 1,850 of Exeter’s 5,001 registered voters (some 37 percent) turned out in bad weather and days before Christmas for the special election that drew some of the state’s leading Democrats, including General Treasurer Gina Raimondo, to Exeter to make last-minute phone calls on behalf of their fellow party members.According to the local board of canvassers, each of the four council members survived the recall attempt by wide margins: Arlene B. Hicks, the council president (681 votes in favor of recall, 1,171 against); William Monahan, the vice president (679 in favor of recall, 1,179 against); Calvin Ellis (681 in favor of recall, 1,171 against); and Robert Johnson (693 in favor of recall, 1,164 against).
“We need our guns,” DelTuro said. “I’ve had guns all my life. I’ve never shot anyone.”What does that mean? Just because he hasn't doesn't mean others won't. And further, this will not take his guns away. It may mean that it will now be harder to get his permit to carry his guns in public places since Rhode Island is a "may issue" state. So what? Incidents of using guns for self protection or to stop a crime in public are miniscule compared to incidents of accidental discharges or homicides by "law abiding" conceal carry permit holders. Just see the Ohh Shoot blog, or Kid Shootings or Walmart Shootings or Joe Nocera's Gun Report for more on this and the Violence Policy Center's Concealed Carry Killers report. This kind of fear, paranoia and hysteria about guns is brought to us by the corporate gun lobby. Guns are dangerous weapons designed to kill other people. We need stronger gun laws, not looser laws if we intend to protect our citizens from the devastation of gun violence occurring every day in communities all over America.
Let's hope it ends here but nothing ever ends with the ever challenging and ever vitriolic extremists. Before, during and after the memorials for the Sandy Hook victims, some ratcheted up their not so veiled threats against gun violence prevention advocates. What is it about gun violence prevention advocates, especially women, that makes some of the gun rights extremists so angry? When a photo was posted of some women from a Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America at a vigil on Saturday, a gun rights activist, using his own name, suggested that they would make good targets for bullets.
Senseless. Why? See here for more on this.
And I will end with this great editorial in the St.Louis Post Dispatch:
We've been "mad" for a long time in America. We've been afraid of a small minority of crazed people in America and a gun lobby that has managed to scare our politicians out of doing what they know is the right thing to do. And when they try, things get ugly. This is not the America we want or deserve post Sandy Hook. This is the America we have. We are better than this. Enough is enough. Let's get to work to make the changes that will keep us all safe from the gun violence that devastates way too many families. Shame on us all for allowing school shootings and every day shootings to become the "new normal."In Missouri, our state lawmakers turned Newtown into a joke.Elected officials such as Sen. Brian Nieves, R-Washington, trashed the memories of the dead children and their adult protectors, like Victoria Soto, Rachel Davino, Anne Marie Murphy, Lauren Rousseau, Mary Sherlach and Dawn Hochsprung. They filed legislation that would have erased even the most common-sense gun laws in Missouri, seeking to nullify literally every federal gun law ever passed.They sought to criminalize the very law enforcement officials the public expects to respond to such mass shootings, lest they try to take guns from killers, or trace their origins.One year after Newtown, even after such a foolish and unconstitutional law passed and was vetoed, Missouri Republicans are back for a second bite of the federal nullification apple.It’s as if they are symbolically mowing down those 20 children again, using the machine guns they want to make legal in the Show-Me State.We don’t believe most of the lawmakers who vote for such garbage — and that’s the nicest thing we can call it — actually believe that the Second Amendment is under attack, or that President Barack Obama is coming for their guns, or that criminalizing the behavior of police officers is a good idea.No, they’re scared. They’re scared of the NRA. They’re scared of the concentrated pockets of older, white, angry voters who have been drawn into districts intended to elect only the most rabidly right wing of candidates. They’re scared of talk radio. They’re scared of that which they do not know. (...)If the actions of gun buyers, Congress and state legislators are our guide, 20 dead children did nothing to slake this nation’s lust for violence.God help us. We’ve gone mad.